NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tsakirios [2021] NSWDC 461 Hearing dates: 12 August 2021 Date of orders: 6 September 2021 Decision date: 06 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Coleman SC DCJ Decision: 1 I grant the applicant a Certificate under s 2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW), certifying: (a) If the prosecution had, before the proceedings were instituted, been in possession of evidence of all of the relevant facts, it would not have been reasonable to institute the proceedings, and (b) That any act or omission of the applicant that contributed, or might have contributed, to the institution or continuation of the proceedings was reasonable in the circumstances. Catchwords: COSTS – Application for Costs in Criminal Proceedings – Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) – Test of Unreasonableness on behalf of the Hypothetical Prosecutor – Whether the Applicant has Satisfied its Onus Legislation Cited: Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) ss 2, 2(1)(a), 3, 3(1)(a), 3(1)(b) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 97(2) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 165(1)(b) Cases Cited: Allerton v DPP (1991) 24 NSWLR 550 Beatson v R [2015] NSWCCA 17 Fitzgerald v R [2016] HCA 28 The Queen v Baden‑Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308 The Queen v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618 R v Pavy (1997) 98 A Crim R 296 R v Johnston [2000] NSWCCA 197 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Costs Parties: Crown (Respondent) Terry Tsakirios (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Aresh (Respondent) Mr R Pettit (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate