NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rosanne Cleary as the Legal Personal Representative of the Estate of the late Fortunato (aka Frank) Gatt v Amaca Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDDT 5 Hearing dates: 6 July 2019; 17 July 2020; 29 July 2020; 3 and 4 August 2020; 21 September 2020; 27 October 2020; 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 November 2020; 15 February 2021 Date of orders: 6 September 2021 Decision date: 06 September 2021 Before: Strathdee, J Decision: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $540,000.00. 2. Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed. 3. If any alternate costs order is sought, parties must notify my associate within 14 days. Catchwords: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL – causation – balance of probabilities – negligence – deceased was a smoker – lung cancer – contributory negligence – use of epidemiological evidence – effect of smoking and exposure to asbestos fibres – impossible to determine the cause through medical examination – whether epidemiological evidence established a cause on the balance of probabilities ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – rules of evidence – examination and cross-examination – rule in Browne v Dunn – whether Tribunal erred in failing to have regard to the circumstances that evidence not accepted by Tribunal went unchallenged by cross-examination Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Workers Compensation (Dust Diseases) Act Cases Cited: Ali v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 183 Allianz Australia Ltd v Sim (2012) 10 DDCR 325 Allianz Australia v Sim (2012) 10 DDCR 325 Amaca Pty Ltd v Booth (2011) 246 CLR 36 Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis (2010) CLR 111; [2010] HCA 5 Amaca v Ellis (2010) 240 CLR 111 Browne v Dunn (1983) 6 R 67 Dasreef v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553 Evans v Queanbeyan City Council (2010) 9 DDCR 541 Ghosh v Medical Council of New South Wales (2020) 102 NSWLR 303 Hull v Thompson [2001] NSWCA 359 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Judd v Amaca Pty Ltd [2003] NSWDDT 12 Scalise v Bezzina & Ors [2003] NSWCA 362 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Brown (2006) 66 NSWLR 540 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rosanne Cleary as the legal personal representative of the estate of the late Fortunato (aka Frank) Gatt (Plaintiff) Amaca Pty Limited (First Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr G Parker SC and Mr J Sharpe appeared for the Plaintiff Mr D Hooke SC and Mr D Klineberg appeared for the Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate