NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Prouten v Chapman [2021] NSWCA 207 Hearing dates: 2 February 2021 Date of orders: 13 September 2021 Decision date: 13 September 2021 Before: Meagher and Leeming JJA at [1]; Brereton JA at [29]. Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – Duty of care – Particular relationships – Users of public right of passage – Duty owed to postal delivery officer by owners of caravan parked on nature strip – Formulation of risk – Where postal delivery officer claimed to have collided with concealed extender bed protruding from caravan – Presence of caravan insufficient – Risk arising specifically from concealed extender bed – Formulation must account for driver taking reasonable care for own safety NEGLIGENCE – Breach – Whether risk foreseeable – Whether risk not insignificant – Whether reasonable person would have taken precautions – Probability of harm – Seriousness of harm – Burden of taking precautions – Where limited or no social utility of activity creating risk – Where a reasonable response was to do nothing – Breach not established – Appeal dismissed APPEALS – Procedural fairness – Failure to give reasons – Adequacy of reasons – Requisite standard of reasons for accepting and rejecting evidence and for making credit findings APPEALS – From findings of fact and credit findings – Function of appellate court – Restraints on appellate interference – Obligation to undertake a real review of the evidence and reasons – Where overarching adverse credibility finding made – Where appellant's account of incident rejected – Whether credit finding informed by assessment of demeanour or only by inconsistencies in evidence – Where demeanour neither expressly relied upon nor disclaimed – Court able to interfere with factual findings but fresh findings would require retrial Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5C Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 166(f), 167 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 3 Road Rules 2014 (NSW), r 197 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Cases Cited: Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; [1987] HCA 7 Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Buckle v Bayswater Road Board (1936) 57 CLR 259; [1936] HCA 65 Bunnings Group Ltd v Giudice [2018] NSWCA 144 Container Terminals Australia Ltd v Huseyin [2008] NSWCA 320 Davies v Mann (1842) 10 M&W 546; 152 ER 588 Douglass v The Queen (2012) 86 ALJR 1086; [2012] HCA 34 Dovuro v Wilkins (2003) 215 CLR 317; [2003] HCA 51 DW v The Queen (2004) 150 A Crim R 139; [2004] ACTCA 22 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Galea v Galea (1990) 19 NSWLR 263 Gautam v Health Care Complaints Commission [2021] NSWCA 85 Goodrich Aerospace Pty Ltd v Arsic (2006) 66 NSWLR 186; [2006] NSWCA 187 Greenhalgh v British Railways Board [1969] 2 QB 286; [1969] 2 All ER 114 Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 King v Collins [2007] NSWCA 122 Kollas v Scurrah (2008) 49 MVR 437; [2008] NSWCA 17 Lee v Lee (2019) 266 CLR 129; [2019] HCA 28 Maaz v Fullerton Property Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 79 March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506; [1991] HCA 12 Manley v Alexander (2005) 80 ALJR 413; [2005] HCA 79 Mason v Demasi [2009] NSWCA 227 Masterton Homes Pty Ltd v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1996) 33 IPR 417 McGeown v Northern Ireland Housing Executive [1995] 1 AC 233; [1994] 3 All ER 53 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323; [2001] HCA 30 Motorcycling Events Group Australia Pty Ltd v Kelly (2013) 86 NSWLR 55; [2013] NSWCA 361 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd's Rep 403 Queensland v Masson (2020) 94 ALJR 785; [2020] HCA 28 R v Barrowman (2007) 96 SASR 294; [2007] SASC 28 R v Keyte (2000) 78 SASR 68; [2000] SASC 382 R v Power (2003) 141 A Crim R 203; [2003] SASC 77 Ryan v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (2020) 91 MVR 282; [2020] NSWCA 38 Shaw v Thomas (2010) Aust Tort Reports ¶82-065; [2010] NSWCA 169 Sibraa v Brown [2012] NSWCA 328 Snitzer v Becker Milk Co Ltd (1976) 75 DLR (3d) 649 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Turnbull v Alm [2004] NSWCA 173 Verryt v Schoupp (2015) 70 MVR 484; [2015] NSWCA 128 Yates Property Co Pty Ltd (in liq) v Darling Harbour Authority (1991) 24 NSWLR 156 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michelle Leanne Prouten (Appellant) Darren Chapman (First Respondent) Megan Rebecca Chapman (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate