NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hamlin v Council of the City of Sydney [2021] NSWIRComm 1066 Hearing dates: 8 September 2021 Date of orders: 8 September 2021 Decision date: 08 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Chief Commissioner Constant, Commissioner Sloan and Commissioner Muir Decision: Leave to appeal is refused Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – whether exercise of discretion disclosed error – no substantial issue of principle or law having wider implications or widespread practical application – no demonstrable error disclosed – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 ss 84, 188, 191 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 Cases Cited: Antonakopoulos v State Bank of NSW (1999) 91 IR 385 Big W Discount Stores v Donato [1995] 58 IR 239 Commissioner of Police v Platts [2021] NSWIRComm 1021 Hamlin v City of Sydney Council [2021] NSWIRComm 1010 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 King v State Bank of New South Wales (No 2) [2002] NSWIRComm 353 Knowles v Anglican Church Property Trust (No. 2) [1999] NSWIRComm 576 North v Television Corporation Ltd (1976) 11 ALR 599 Zopf v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Department of Customer Service [2020] NSWIRComm 1012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Warren Hamlin (appellant) Council of the City of Sydney (respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Fraser (appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate