NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Donaghy v Hammond [2021] NSWLEC 1526 Hearing dates: 1 June 2021 Date of orders: 10 September 2021 Decision date: 10 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Galwey AC Decision: See orders at [27] Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – Pt 2 application – large tree overhanging dwellings – whether the tree has caused damage – whether further damage or injury is likely – orders for pruning – orders for tree management plan Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2, ss 7, 9, 10, 12 Cases Cited: Cayley v Gervay [2021] NSWLEC 1254 The Owners – Strata Plan 3346 v The Owners – Strata Plan 10848 [2021] NSWLEC 1504 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Texts Cited: AS 4373-2007 'Pruning of amenity trees' Safe Work Australia 2016 'Guide to managing risks of tree trimming and removal work' Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2015, Chapter 39 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Donaghy (Applicant) Michael Hammond (Respondent) Representation: P Donaghy (Litigant in Person) (Applicant) S Cominos (Counsel) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Solari & Stock (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/32084 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
Background to the application 1. Paul Donaghy ('the applicant') has applied to the Court pursuant to s 7 (Pt 2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 ('the Trees Act'), seeking orders for the removal of a large neighbouring Sydney Blue Gum (Eucalyptus saligna) ('the tree') that overhangs his property. The tree is on an adjoining Gymea Bay property owned by Michael Hammond ('the respondent').
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate