NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: First Mortgage Capital Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1143 Hearing dates: 23-24 August 2021 Date of orders: 9 September 2021 Decision date: 09 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Exercise of power to redeem first mortgages and charge interest of 60% p.a. on amounts paid out held to be unfair and unconscionable. Parties ordered to bring in Short Minutes of Orders. Catchwords: MORTGAGES AND SECURITIES – powers of mortgagee – clogs on equity of redemption – collateral advantages – plaintiff advanced $289,915 to mortgagors – second ranking mortgages held over various properties – mortgage charged Lower Rate of Interest at 30% p.a. and Higher Rate of Interest at 60% p.a. in event of default – clause 18.3(h) which operates following default allowed plaintiff to pay out other mortgages – any money so paid to form part of the "Secured Money" – plaintiff pays out first ranking mortgages over three of mortgagors' properties for total of $487,000 – plaintiff seeks to pay out first ranking mortgages over a further two properties – whether clause 18.3(h) provides a collateral advantage and is an impediment to redemption – held that plaintiff's power to pay out first mortgages and charge interest at 60% p.a. on amounts paid out can be regarded as a collateral advantage and an impediment to redemption – whether clause 18.3(h) is unfair and unconscionable – held that reliance on power to charge interest at 60% p.a. on amounts paid out to first mortgagees is unfair and unconscionable – reliance on clause 18.3(h) in that fashion amounts to an unconscientious exercise of a contractual right – plaintiff entitled to rely upon clause 18.3(h) to redeem or acquire first mortgages but is confined to charging interest at the rate provided for in the first mortgage Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), s 12CB Cases Cited: Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1868 Charmelyn Enterprises Pty Ltd v Klonis (1981) 2 BPR 9527 Cityland and Property (Holdings) Ltd v Dabrah [1968] 1 Ch 166 G. and C. Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Company Ltd [1914] AC 25 Guardian Mortgages v Miller [2004] NSWSC 1236 Re Modular Design Group Pty Ltd (1994) 53 NSWLR 96 Westfield Holdings Ltd v Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd (1992) 32 NSWLR 194 Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Mortgage Capital Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd (First Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) Zufaidah Binte Juri (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Sheik Taleb Bin Sheik Husain (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Jude Thaddeus Albert (Fourth Defendant) Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd(Third Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A W Smith (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Mr B Zhao (First Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) Mr M D Tehan (Second and Third Defendants/Cross-Claimants) Mr C Hudson (Third Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate