NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Probert v Christie [2021] NSWLEC 1529 Hearing dates: 10 June 2021 Date of orders: 10 September 2021 Decision date: 10 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The orders of the Court are: (1) The application is dismissed. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – does covenant over height of trees apply – were the trees planted – do the trees form a hedge – are views severely obstructed – balancing of interests Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 ss14A, 14B, 14E, 14F Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 Schedule 7 Cases Cited: Fyday v The Owners - Strata Plan No 15039 [2019] NSWLEC 1150 Grantham Holdings Pty Ltd v Miller [2011] NSWLEC 1122 Haindl v Daisch [2011] NSWLEC 1145 Johnson v Angus (2012) 190 LGERA 334; [2012] NSWLEC 192 Tenacity Consulting v Warringah (2004) 134 LGERA 23; [2004] NSWLEC 140 Texts Cited: AS4373:2007 Pruning of amenity trees Review of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW) (2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Keith Probert (First Applicant) Susan Probert (Second Applicant) Amiel Christie (Respondent) Representation: K Probert (Litigant in person) (First Applicant) S Probert (Litigant in Person) (Second Applicant) A Christie (Litigant in person) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/63266 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate