NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Absolute Tiling Solutions Pty Limited v Bonett; Bonett v Absolute Tiling Solutions Pty Limited [2021] NSWDC 475 Hearing dates: 17 August 2021 Date of orders: 18 August 2021 Decision date: 18 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: 1. Grant leave to the plaintiff/cross-defendant to file an amended defence to cross-claim relying on s 18E of the Home Building Act 1989. 2. The plaintiff/cross-defendant pay for any costs thrown away by reason of the amendment, but otherwise reserve the costs of the application. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — pleadings — amendment — late application for amendment – unexplained substantial delay – wasted costs – unfair prejudice Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56, s 65 Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), s 3B, s 18B, s 18E Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.14 Cases Cited: Hannaford v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 297 The Owners – Strata Plan No 74602 v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1916 The Sydney Building Company Limited v Sinac [2019] NSWCATAP 43 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Absolute Tiling Solutions Pty Limited (plaintiff/cross-defendant) Shaun Bonett (defendant/cross-claimant) Representation: Counsel: Ms L Hulmes (defendant/cross-claimant)
Solicitors: Finn Roache Lawyers (plaintiff/cross-defendant) Henry William Lawyers (defendant/cross-claimant) File Number(s): 2020/101203 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate