NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v D [2021] NSWDC 483 Hearing dates: 02 and 12 July 2021 Crown written submissions: 29 June and 09 July 2021 Defence written submissions: undated Date of orders: 10 September 2021 Decision date: 10 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: See [191] onwards Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW ––– Fact finding on sentence where jury found Offender not guilty of intentionally causing grievous bodily harm and guilty of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm – Child aged between 8 and 12 weeks old at the time of the offence – Victim born with a number of congenital abnormalities – Crown asserted life-long brain injuries, retinoschisis of left eye, rib fractures, bruising and auricular haematoma to ear due to the Offender's actions – Crown asserted the injuries were caused by shaking, forceful holding and massaging the Victim as well as blunt force trauma consistent with the Victim's mother hearing a "thud" – Defence argued that the impact arising from the offending was less due to the Victim's congenital abnormalities – Left sided auricular haematoma to ear not established beyond reasonable doubt SENTENCE –– Offending found above mid-range of objective seriousness SENTENCE –– Aggravating factors –Substantial harm- – Victim vulnerable – Offence occurred in the Victim's home – Offender in position of trust and authority – Subjective factors –Offender's background cannot be characterised as deprived or dysfunctional such that the principles in R v Bugmy apply –– Offender's mental health such that the need for specific deterrence is moderated – Discount for offer to plead guilty to subject offence prior to trial – Reduction in sentence for the facilitation of the course of justice – Offender's prospects of rehabilitation found somewhat guarded and medium risk of re-offending – COVID-19 impacts on inmates – Special circumstances found Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 33, 35, Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 21A, 28, 30E, 44 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Regulation 2017 (NSW) r 9 Cases Cited: Beavis v R [2018] NSWCCA 248 BJ v R [2018] NSWCCA 231 Bott v R [2012] NSWCCA 191 Bugmy v the Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571 DPP v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Droudis v R [2020] NSWCCA 322 Fisher v R [2021] NSWCA 91 Haoui v R [2008] NSWCCA 209 Hoskins v R [2021] NSWCCA 169 Kelly v R [2021] NSWCCA 173 Magro v Regina [2020] NSWCCA 25 Manocha v R [2019] NSWCCA 122 Merrick v R [2017] NSWCCA 264 MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260 Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120 Munda v State of Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [2013] HCA 38 Oinonen v R [1999] NSWCCA 310 Perkins v R [2018] NSWCCA 62 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v Cardoso (2003) 137 A Crim R 535 R v Do (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 512 R v Halloun [2014] NSWSC 1705 R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 R v Johnson [2003] NSWCCA 129 R v Johnson [2003] NSWCCA 129 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Smith [2005] NSWCCA 286 R v Spinks [2021] NSWCCA 322 R v SS [2021] NSWCCA 56 R v SS [2021] NSWCCA 56 R v Tsiaras [1996] 1 VR 398 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412 Regina v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 Rossall v R [2021] NSWCCA200 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] 164 CLR 465 Z v R [2015] NSWCCA 274 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (the Crown) D (the Offender) Representation: Counsel: Ms E Curran (the Crown) Ms M Phelps (the Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate