NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Yildirim [2021] NSWCATOD 146 Hearing dates: 6, 7, 8 April 2021 Date of orders: 17 September 2021 Decision date: 17 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member R Boland, Senior Member J Sulentic, Senior Member J Barker, General Member Decision: (1) Mr Yildirim is guilty of professional misconduct (2) The proceedings are listed for directions in respect of the conduct of Stage 2 hearing at a date to be determined by the Registrar Catchwords: HEALTH PRACTITONER — unsatisfactory professional conduct — whether conduct is of a sexual nature EVIDENCE — assessment of competing evidence — assessment of reliability of evidence — demeanour evidence STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION — whether conduct can be unsatisfactory professional conduct within both s 139B(1)(a) and s 139B(1)(l) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Attia v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWSC 1066 Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 1200 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Bronze Wing International Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2017] NSWCA 41 Camden v McKenzie [2007] QCA 136; [2008] 1 Qd R 39 Campbell v Campbell [2015] NSWSC 784 Forster v Hunter New England Area Health Service [2010] NSWCA 106 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 Gautam v Health Care Complaints Commission [2021] NSWCA 85 Harkin v R (1989) 38 A Crim R 296 Health Care Complaints Commission v Achurch [2019] NSWCATOD 20 Health Care Complaints Commission v Grygiel (Stay application) [2019] NSWCATOD 123 Health Care Complaints Commission v Hart [2021] NSWCATOD 36 Health Care Complaints Commission v Morsingh [2021] NSWCATOD 13 Health Care Complaints Commission v Priyamanna [2015] NSWCATOD 138 Health Care Complaints Commission v Sultan [2018] NSWCA 303 King v Health Care Complaints Commission [2011] NSWCA 353 McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58; [2013] 1 WLR 2477 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 66; (1992) 67 ALJR 170; (1992) 110 ALR 449 Ng v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd's Rep 403 Papakosmas v R [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 R v Court [1988] 2 WLR 1071 State of New South Wales v Hunt [2014] NSWCA 47 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Oscar Yildirim (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Britt ((Applicant) S Maybury (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate