NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Leahy v Watermin Drillers Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 281 Hearing dates: 31 August 2021 Date of orders: 20 September 2021 Decision date: 20 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Cowdroy ADCJ AO QC D. Goldstein. Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to Appeal is refused. 2. The Appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL - written contract for water drilling – oral variation – whether Tribunal erred in preferring oral evidence of contractor – appellant claiming denial of natural justice due to lack of waterflow evidence – no expert evidence provided before Tribunal of waterflow to support appellant's claims – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Fair Trading Act 1987 Cases Cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Chapman v Taylor [2004] NSW CA 456 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 449 John Prendergast and Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 59 Johnson v Johnson [1900] P. 19 Lawless v The Queen (1979) 142 CLR 659 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S 20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 Minister of Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Re-Refugee Tribunal; Ex parte H (2001) 179 ALR 45 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 81 FCR 71 Temple v AMR Motors Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 221 Xu v Jinhong Design & Constructions Pty Ltd (2011) NSWCA 277 Texts Cited: Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 4th edition (2009) Lawbook Co Category: Principal judgment Parties: Louis Leahy (Appellant) Watermin Drillers Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self represented) Respondent (Self represented) File Number(s): 2021/181553 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Citation: Nil Date of Decision: 07 June 2021 Before: W Priestley, General Member File Number(s): GEN 20/43063
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate