NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: A v B [2021] NSWDC 491 Hearing dates: 10-14 May 2021; 15 June 2021 (written submissions); 9 July 2021 (written submissions); 20 August 2021 (oral submissions) Date of orders: 15 September 2021 Decision date: 15 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Dicker SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed. (3) Liberty to the parties to seek a different costs order to that in (2) above within 14 days. Catchwords: TORTS – intentional torts – battery – personal injury – psychiatric injury – historic sexual assault alleged – damages sought for battery and psychiatric injury and consequential loss – whether the plaintiff consented to the activity in question – whether the account of the plaintiff should be accepted on the balance of probabilities Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132 Cubillo v Commonwealth (No 2) [2000] FCA 1084; (2000) 103 FCR 1 Danckert v Tonkin [2015] NSWSC 1570 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 Gautem v Health Care Complaints Commission [2021] NSWCA 85 Gersbach v Gersbach [2018] NSWSC 1685 Gorman v McKnight [2020] NSWCA 20 KS v GR [2020] NSWDC 73 Kumar v Legal Services Commissioner [2015] NSWCA 161 Lamb v Cotogno [1987] HCA 47; (1987) 164 CLR 1 MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic [1991] HCA 3; (1991) 171 CLR 657 MC v Morris [2019] NSWSC 1326 Musa v Alzreaiawi [2021] NSWCA 12 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170; [1992] HCA 66 Nguyen v Tran [2018] NSWCA 215 Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Cox [2014] NSWCA 328 Sangha v Baxter [2009] NSWCA 78 State of New South Wales v Riley [2003] NSWCA 208; (2003) 57 NSWLR 496 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 White v Johnston (2015) 87 NSWLR 779; [2015] NSWCA 18 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mrs A (Plaintiff) Mr B (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Andrews (Plaintiff) J Sleight (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate