NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Heffernan v Innes & Anor (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1187 Hearing dates: In Chambers on the papers Date of orders: 17 September 2021 Decision date: 17 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: Refer to paragraph [174] Catchwords: COSTS – Probate proceedings - Where Court finds in favour of an informal document propounded by the Plaintiff; rejected the defence of lack of testamentary capacity; and dismissed the Cross-Claim of the Defendants which alleged that there was a will made by the deceased which was not found and the original, a copy, or even a draft, of which no one had seen – Defendants had also asserted that the unfound will was removed by the father of the Plaintiff, after the deceased's death, from the deceased's home – Serious allegation of what may have amounted to criminal conduct under s 135 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) made but not proved – Whether Defendants maintained defences and made the serious allegation which had no reasonable prospects of success COSTS - Whether there should be exception to general rule that costs follow the event bearing in mind nature of the proceedings or otherwise – Consideration given to the nature of the proceedings COSTS - Offers made by the Plaintiff – Whether each a Calderbank offer – Each offer not accepted by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff obtains an order on the claims no less favourable to her than the terms of the offer - Relevance of offer made if it was not a Calderbank offer on question of costs Plaintiff contends that the Defendants should pay her costs of the proceedings calculated on the indemnity basis – Defendants orally submit that their costs should be paid out of the estate of the deceased COSTS - How costs should be borne and whether the circumstances warrant the exercise of the Court's discretion to make an indemnity costs order in favour of the Plaintiff. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 3 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 135 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 131 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) ss 74-80 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 20.26, 42.2 Cases Cited: Ausino International Pty Ltd v Apex Sports Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1119 Bassett v Cameron (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 419 Bouras v Grandelis (2005) 65 NSWLR 214; [2005] NSWCA 463 Bullabidgee Pty Ltd v McCleary (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 343 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 WLR 586; [1975] 3 All ER 333 Chaina v Alvaro Homes Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 353 Chant v Curcuruto; Chant v Curcuruto (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 882 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Commissioner of Taxation v Ross (No 2) [2021] FCA 1088 Commonwealth of Australia v Gretton [2008] NSWCA 117 Coregas Pty Limited v Penford Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 11 Crump & Ors v Equine Nutrition Systems Pty Ltd trading as Horsepower & Anor (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 25 Davies v Gregory (1873) LR 3 P&D 28 Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322 EMI Records Limited v Ian Cameron Wallace Ltd [1983] 1 Ch 59 Evans Shire Council v Richardson (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 61 Evans v Braddock (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 518 Girardi as trustee for The Superannuation Fund – Greengate Investments v Duncum [2021] NSWSC 1138 Goodwin v Avison & Ors [2021] EWHC 2356 Gray v Hart; Estate of Harris (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1562 Greer v Greer [2021] QCA 174 Grynberg v Muller [2002] NSWSC 350 Hamod v New South Wales [2002] FCAFC 97; 188 ALR 659 Herning v GWS Machinery Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 375 His Eminence Metropolitan Petar, Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia and New Zealand v The Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 142 Hunter v Roberts (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 235 Jones v Bradley (No. 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 Liverpool City Council v Estephan Estephan (Executor and Administrator of the Estate of the late Jocelyn Estephan) [2009] NSWCA 161 Luxmore Pty Ltd v Hydedale Pty Ltd (2008) 20 VR 481; [2008] VSCA 212 Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd v Treasury Wine Estates Limited (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 116 Mr Rental Australia Pty Ltd v IRD Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 918 Munday v Bowman (1997) FLC 92-784 Noon v Bondi Beach Astra Retirement Village Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 285 Old v McInnes and Hodgkinson [2011] NSWCA 410 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Perpetual Trustee v Baker [1999] NSWCA 244 Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries (No 2) [1996] FCA 1942; (1996) 72 FCR 151 South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service v King [2006] NSWCA 2 Spiers v English [1907] P 122 Sze Tu v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 91 The Anderson Group Pty Ltd v Tynan Motors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 120; (2006) 67 NSWLR 706 Tickell v Trifleska Pty Ltd (1990) 25 NSWLR 353 Trustee for the Salvation Army (NSW) Property Trust v Becker (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 194 Tu v Tu Estate of Tu [2008] NSWSC 458 Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335 Walsh v Walsh (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1281 Wharton v Bancroft [2012] EWHC 91 (Ch) Wright v Apthorpe [2020] NSWCA 300 Ying v Song [2011] NSWSC 618 Texts Cited: Dyson Heydon, Cross on Evidence (12th ed, 2020, LexisNexis Australia) G E Dal Pont, Law of Costs (4th ed, 2018, LexisNexis Butterworths) William E Miller, Probate Practice (1900, Maxwell) Category: Costs Parties: Lisa Louise Heffernan (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate