NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wang v Liu; Liu v Wang [2021] NSWSC 1193 Hearing dates: 23-25 and 27 August 2021, further written submissions 31 August and 1 September 2021 Date of orders: 20 September 2021 Decision date: 20 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Plaintiff entitled to judgment against the defendant. Cross-claim to be dismissed Catchwords: CONTRACT – proper construction – whether document executed by the parties in the Chinese language constituted a binding promise by the defendant to repay the plaintiff as a debt money that plaintiff paid the defendant to invest in a company that the defendant stated would develop property in Sydney – whether the document did not come into effect as an agreement because not all persons alleged to be parties to it executed the document – whether any contract evidenced by the document was void for uncertainty – where plaintiff paid large sums to the defendant for the purpose of investment in the company – where defendant had in turn paid large sums to the plaintiff in purported repayment of the funds advanced RESTITUTION – where defendant contended he executed the document under the mistaken belief that it was enforceable – where defendant sought to recover the payments he made to the plaintiff on that basis Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Brambles Holdings Limited v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153; [2001] NSWCA 61 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, Heydon on Contract (2019, Thomson Reuters) M Davies, A S Bell, P L G Brereton and M Douglas, Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia (10th ed, 2020, Lexis Nexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ruifa Wang (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Wensheng Liu (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: D Cook SC with J D Little (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) H K Insall SC (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Solicitors: Lin Tang & Co Lawyers (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Hugh & Associates Lawyers (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) File Number(s): 2018/375643
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate