NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lu v Minter (No 2) [2021] NSWDC 503 Hearing dates: 23 September 2021 Date of orders: 23 September 2021 Decision date: 23 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: Order: (1) Plaintiff's application for leave under UCPR r 7.3 to issue two subpoenae to give evidence and five subpoenae to produce documents refused. Catchwords: TORT – defamation – defendants bring application for summary dismissal of the plaintiff's claim on the basis of hopeless pleading errors - self-represented plaintiff issues subpoenae to the defendants and third parties to give evidence and produce documents – leave under UCPR r 7.3 required for litigants in person to issue subpoenae – leave refused. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (UCPR) rule 7.3 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 Cases Cited: Buswell v Carles [2012] WASC 509 Lu v Minter (District Court (NSW), 12 August 2021, unrep Mallegowda v Sood [2013] NSWDC 98 NSW Commissioner of Police v Tuxford [2002] NSWCA 139 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 357 Walsh v Bennetts (No 2) [2015] WASC122 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Min Lu
Defendants: 1st Defendant: Rick Minter 2nd Defendant: Bronwyn Greene 3rd Defendant: Tara Murphy 4th Defendant: Felix Ter Chian Tan 5th Defendant: Lemuria Carter 6th Defendant: Paul Ajnas 7th Defendant: Yenni Tim Representation: Counsel: Defendants: Mr T Senior
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate