NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Police v Robinson [2020] NSWLC 5 Hearing dates: 9 March 2020 (Hearing - Bankstown) 20 July 2020 (Written submissions - Fairfield) Decision date: 09 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Magistrate Tsavdaridis Decision: Sequence 1 - Break, enter and steal - Guilty Sequence 2 - Break, enter and steal - Guilty Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Break, enter and steal - where prosecution case based in part on direct evidence and in part on circumstantial evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss.4, 105A, 112(1)(a), 117 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s.38(1)(c) Cases Cited: Chamberlain v R (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; [1984] HCA 7 Fleming v R (1998) 197 CLR 250 Ghamrawi v R (2017) 95 NSWLR 405; 269 A Crim R 146; [2017] NSWCCA 195 Peacock v R (1911) 13 CLR 619 Pitkin v R (1995) 130 ALR 35 Plomp v R (1963) 110 CLR 234 R v Boyce (1954) 38 Crim App R 111 R v Manunta (1990) 54 SASR 17 Shepherd v R (1990) 170 CLR 573 Stanford v R [2007] NSWCCA 370 Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462 Texts Cited: East, Pleas of the Crown (1803), vol 2, p 490 Category: Principal judgment Parties: NSW Police (Prosecution) Harry Robinson (Defendant) Representation: Solicitors: Ms P Hughes, Sgt (Police Prosecutor) Mr D Leamey (Solicitor for Defendant) File Number(s): JL: 2019/261849 / Charge: H74023385
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate