NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Saadieh [2021] NSWCCA 232 Hearing dates: 24 September 2021 Decision date: 27 September 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beech-Jones CJ at CL at [2]; Adamson J at [10] Decision: (1) Refuse the detention application. (2) Confirm that the respondent is to be released to bail on the conditions specified by Hamill J on 17 September 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – detention application following grant of bail by single judge – terrorist offence – legislative requirement for exceptional circumstances – fulfilled by prospect that length of remand may exceed sentence if respondent convicted of offence charged CRIMINAL LAW – detention application – relevance of strength of Crown case – difficulties of assessment before whole brief served CRIMINAL LAW – detention application – assessment of risk of committing serious offence if released – relevance of duration and extent of police surveillance of respondent prior to his arrest and charge – application refused Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), ss 4, 17, 18, 50, 67, 75 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 11 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 15AA Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 101.4, 101.5, 101.6, 102.1, 102.3, 102.8, 104.5, 119.4 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 68 Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW), s 29 Cases Cited: AB v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2016] NSWSC 1042 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Saadieh [2021] NSWSC 1186 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mawad [2015] NSWCCA 227 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Lin v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2017] NSWSC 312 R v Abdirahman-Khalif (Supreme Court (SA), Peek J, 16 April 2019, unrep) R v NK [2016] NSWSC 498 The Queen v Abdiraham-Khalif [2020] HCA 36; (2020) 283 A Crim R 272 Trinh v R [2016] NSWCCA 110 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Applicant) Joseph Saadieh (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Single SC / N Evans (Applicant) O Samin (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate