NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Lucy Patricia Klewer pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)1 [2021] NSWSC 1225 Hearing dates: On the papers. Date of orders: 29 September 2021 Decision date: 29 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: The application is refused. Catchwords: Application under s 78(1) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) for an inquiry into the applicant's conviction – where applicant is a vexatious litigant – whether an application under s 78 is a "proceeding" under s 4 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) – whether a "criminal proceeding" – whether leave required – held, application under s 78 not a "proceeding" – leave not required – no doubt or question raised as to the applicant's guilt – applicant refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 3(1) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 11, 78, 79 Crimes (Personal and Domestic Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 8 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61 Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), s 179 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 69, 84, Third Schedule Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Part 55 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 4, 8, 14, Sch 1 cl 3(2) Cases Cited: Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales v Potier (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 238 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318; [2003] HCA 28 Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd & Anor v Workcover Authority of New South Wales & Anor (2006) 66 NSWLR 151; [2006] NSWCA 172 Klewer v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 69 Kostov v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 94 Parker v Comptroller-General of Customs [2007] NSWCA 348 Patsalis v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 307 Potier v Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 129 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales (2013) 85 NSWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 Varley v Attorney-General in and for the State of New South Wales (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lucy Patricia Klewer (Applicant) Attorney General for New South Wales (Submissions in reply) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) D Birch (Attorney General)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate