NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hume Plasterboard Pty Ltd v Best Interiors Aust Pty Ltd & Ors (No.2) [2021] NSWDC 514 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 27 September 2021 Decision date: 27 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 27 Catchwords: COSTS – whether part of successful defendant's costs should not be paid because of non-compliance with procedural directions – whether costs payable by unsuccessful defendant should be paid on indemnity basis – whether Bullock order should be made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 61, 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42.1 Cases Cited: Bullock v London General Omnibus Co [1907] 1 KB 264 Dominello v Dominello (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 257 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Mead v Watson (2005) 23 ACLC 718 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Stephens v Givoenco (No.2) [2011] NSWCA 144 Wardle v Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 388 Yerkey v Jones (1939) 63 CLR 649 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Hume Plasterboard Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Best Interiors Aust Pty Ltd (first defendant) Mr M Li (second defendant) Ms Y M Chu (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Quickenden for the plaintiff No appearance by first defendant Mr M Li appeared in person Mr J Lee for the third defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate