NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hughes v R [2021] NSWCCA 238 Hearing dates: 13 August 2021 Date of orders: 8 October 2021 Decision date: 08 October 2021 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Wilson J at [53]; Fagan J at [54] Decision: Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against conviction — where applicant had entered a plea of guilty to one "rolled up" count of obtaining a financial advantage by deception contrary to s 192E(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) — where applicant sought leave to appeal on the basis that the conviction was wrong in law and the element of deception was not made out — where applicant had by her guilty plea admitted all of the elements of the offence — no miscarriage of justice — leave to appeal refused CRIME — fraud — dishonestly obtain financial advantage by deception — causation — meaning of "obtain" — meaning of "keep a financial advantage that one has" — Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 192D(1)(c) CRIME — fraud — meaning of "deception" — where relevant deception was the "fraudulent transfer of money" — Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 192E Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 192B(1), 192D, 192E Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(b) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166(1)(b) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application pursuant to s 108 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW): Re Robert Burton (a pseudonym) [2021] NSWCCA 87 Bobbe v R (No 2) [2021] NSWCCA 150 Clarkson v R [1987] VR 962 Decision restricted [2019] NSWCCA 43 Director of Public Prosecutions v Ray [1974] AC 370 Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2016] NSWCA 143 Flack v R [2011] NSWCCA 167 Ho and Szeto v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 145 Layt v R [2020] NSWCCA 231 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132; [1995] HCA 41 Milne v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 149; [2014] HCA 4 National Commercial Banking Corporation of Australia Ltd v Batty (1986) 160 CLR 251; [1986] HCA 21 R v Clucas [1949] 2 KB 226 R v Glynatsis [2013] NSWCCA 131; (2013) 230 A Crim R 99 R v Murphy [1965] VicRp26; [1965] VR 187 R v Sagiv (1986) 22 A Crim R 73 R v Toro-Martinez [2000] NSWCCA 216 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tracey Louise Hughes (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Higgins and M Keaney (Applicant) B Hatfield (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate