NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Hy-Tec Industries Pty Ltd for a Variation to the Hy-Tec Industries Pty Ltd – Maxi Concrete Contract Determination [2021] NSWIRComm 1076 Hearing dates: 5 July 2021 Date of orders: 5 July 2021 Decision date: 30 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner Stanton Decision: Determination varied in the terms sought Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW – Contract determination – Variation – application to vary Hy-Tec Industries Pty Ltd – Maxi Concrete Contract Determination by replacing the existing Clauses 2.1 and 2.2 with new and revised provisions as contained in Schedule B of the Application filed in IRC 21/180627– application not opposed – Determination varied Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hy-Tec Industries Pty Ltd Transport Workers Union of New South Wales Representation: J Arndt, Australian Business Lawyers & Advisers (applicant) R Rasmussen, Transport Workers Union of New South Wales (respondent) File Number(s): 2021/180627
decision 1. This matter concerns an application for the variation of the Hy-Tec Industries Pty Ltd – Maxi Concrete Contract Determination (Contract Determination) filed by Hy-Tec Industries Pty Ltd on 16 June 2021. 2. The application was made pursuant to s 320 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) (the Act) and arises out of a dispute heard by the Commission as presently constituted on 2 February 2021 in Matter No IRC 2020/351978. 3. During proceedings in conference on 2 February 2021, the parties advised the Commission that the dispute had been settled subject to agreement on any proposed variation to the Contract Determination. I am satisfied there has been compliance with s 315 of the Act. 4. The matter was listed for hearing on 5 July 2021. Mr J Arndt appeared for Hy-Tec Industries Pty Ltd. Mr R Rasmussen appeared for the Transport Workers Union of New South Wales (TWU). The TWU supported the application. 5. During the hearing, I delivered an extempore decision and determined that the variations sought should be made. Consistent with the requirements of ss 3 and 146 of the Act, I am satisfied that the Contract Determination be varied as set out below in Schedule B under Annexure A to this decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate