NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ida Wolff bht Steven Binetter v Binetter [2021] NSWSC 1249 Hearing dates: 23 to 25 August 2021, 27 August 2021 Date of orders: 1 October 2021 Decision date: 01 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The proceedings be dismissed; (2) Direct the parties to confer within seven days in relation to the appropriate order as to costs; (3) In the event that agreement is reached on the appropriate orders as to costs, the parties to file the proposed orders on or before 5.00pm on 15 October 2021; (4) In the event that no agreement is reached on the appropriate orders as to costs, each party to file and serve: (a) their proposed orders as to costs and any submissions in support of the proposed order that are not to exceed four pages on or before 22 October 2021; (b) any submissions in reply that do not exceed four pages on or before 29 October 2021. Catchwords: LOAN RECOVERY – whether defendant borrowed money from his late Aunty in 2010 – inferences drawn from finding of completion of cheque butt – loan established – whether limitation period suspended because of relevant disability affecting lender – disability must be in the management of her affairs in relation to the cause of action the subject of the proceedings – only evidence adduced specific to the loan suggested lender not substantially impaired in relation to cause of action – limitations on evidence from expert who did not examine lender – onus of proof not discharged – proceedings dismissed. Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Drivas v Jakopovic [2019] NSWCA 2018 Guthrie v Spence (2009) 78 NSWLR 225; [2009] NSWCCA 369 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Kotulski v Attard [1981] 1 NSWLR 115 Shalhoub v Buchanan [2004] NSWSC 99 State of New South Wales v Harlum [2007] NSWCA 120 Strong v Woolworths Ltd (2012) 246 CLR 182; [2012] HCA 182 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd (1956) 99 CLR 560; [1956] HCA 51 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ida Wolff by her tutor Steven Binetter (Plaintiff) Ronald Binetter (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Studdy SC; C Freeman (Plaintiff) G Sirtes SC; C O'Neill (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate