NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Uweinat [2021] NSWSC 1256 Hearing dates: 17 September 2021 Date of orders: 11 October 2021 Decision date: 11 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: (1) The offender is convicted of both offences. (2) In respect of the offence of intentionally advocating the doing of a terrorist act contrary to s 80.2C(1) of the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) the offender is sentenced to 1 year and 8 months imprisonment commencing on 4 December 2019 and expiring on 3 August 2021. (3) In respect of the offence of being a member of an organisation knowing that organisation was a terrorist organisation, contrary to s 102.3(1) of the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) the offender is sentenced to 3 years and 8 months imprisonment commencing on 4 March 2020 and expiring on 3 November 2023. (4) The total effective sentence is one of 3 years and 11 months imprisonment, commencing on 4 December 2019 and expiring on 3 November 2023. (5) I impose a single non-parole period of 2 years and 11 months imprisonment commencing on 4 December 2019 and expiring on 3 November 2022. (6) In light of the fact that the offence contrary to s 102.3(1) carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment, I warn the offender, pursuant to s 105A.23 of the Code, that an application may be made under Division 105A requiring him to be detained in a prison after the end of his sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Sentence – Intentionally advocating a terrorist act – Membership of a terrorist organisation – Where the offender was a member of Islamic State and advocated the commission of terrorist acts in accordance with that organisation's philosophies – Consideration of general principles applicable to sentencing for terrorism-related offences – Where such principles have been developed in the context of sentencing for more serous offending than that committed in the present case – General principles nevertheless applicable – Serious offending committed over a concentrated period of 6 months – Where offender aged 21 at the time of the offending – Offending committed at a time which coincided with the offender's association with members of an antisocial peer group – Some evidence of link between the offender's immaturity and his offending – Unchallenged evidence given by the offender of his renunciation of previously held extremist beliefs – Evidence of contrition – Pleas of guilty entered at the earliest possible opportunity – Cautiously favourable prospects of rehabilitation Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Alou v R (2019) 101 NSWLR 319; [2019] NSWCCA 231 Benbrika v R (2010) 29 VR 593; [2010] VSCA 281 BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; (2010) 201 A Crim R 379 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Besim [2017] VSCA 158 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Fattal [2013] VSCA 276 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v MHK (A Pseudonym) (No 1) (2017) 52 VR 272; [2017] VSCA 157 FL v R [2020] NSWCCA 114 HJ v R [2014] NSWCCA 21 IM v R (2019) 100 NSWLR 110; [2019] NSWCCA 107 Jinde Huang aka Liu v R [2018] NSWCCA 70; (2018) 272 A Crim R 266 JM v R [2012] NSWCCA 83; (2012) 223 A Crim R 55 Khazaal v R (No. 2) [2013] NSWCCA 140; (2013) 223 A Crim R 106 KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51; (2008) 182 A Crim R 571 Lodhi v R [2007] NSWCCA 360; (2007) 179 A Crim R 470 McDowall v R [2019] NSWCCA 29 R (C'Wealth) v Elomar and Ors [2010] NSWSC 10; (2010) 264 ALR 759 R v Alou (No.4) [2018] NSWSC 221; (2018) 330 FLR 402 R v Amati [2019] NSWCCA 193 R v Barot [2007] EWCA Crim 1119 R v Ghazzawy [2017] NSWSC 474 R v Kahar [2016] 1 WLR 3156; [2016] EWCA Crim 568 R v Khalid and ors.[2017] NSWSC 1365 R v Lelikan (2019) 101 NSWLR 490; [2019] NSWCCA 316 R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 691; (2006) 199 FLR 364 R v Mastronardi [2000] NSWCCA 12; (2000) 111 A Crim R 306 R v Touma [2008] NSWSC 1475 R v Tran (2002) 4 VR 457; [2002] VSCA 52 Sharma v R [2017] NSWCCA 85 Xiao v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCCA 4 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina – Crown Youssef Uweinat – Offender Representation: Counsel: S Flood – Crown N Steel – Offender
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate