NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Awraham v R (Cth) [2021] NSWCCA 241 Hearing dates: 21 April 2021 Date of orders: 8 October 2021 Decision date: 08 October 2021 Before: Davies J at [1] Hamill J at [4] Wilson J at [28] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – appeal against sentence –Applicant convicted of state drug and firearm possession offences – Applicant convicted of Commonwealth offence of attempt to possess a commercial quantity of border control drug (cocaine) – question of whether sentence imposed for Commonwealth offence was manifestly excessive – determination Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R (2007) 168 A Crim R 41; [2007] NSWCCA 1 Cargnello v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2012] NSWCCA 162 Cutajar v R [2020] NSWCCA 273 DAB v R [2010] NSWCCA 2745 Dang v R [2013] NSWCCA 246 Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 Dinsdale v The Queen (2002) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 205 A Crim R 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Gow (2015) 252 A Crim R 573; [2015] NSWCCA 208 Hili v R; Jones v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kuti v R [2012] NSWCCA 43 Liu v R [2005] NSWCCA 450 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Ng v R (Cth) [2010] NSWCCA 232 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 R v Aaron Tran; R v Peter Tran; R v Hoang Nguyen 233 A Crim R 167; [2013] NSWCCA 136 R v Awraham [2019] NSWDC 341 R v Boimah [2017] QCA 50 R v Calis [2013] QCA 165 R v Elfar [2003] NSWCCA 358 R v Holland (2011) 205 A Crim R 429; [2011] NSWCCA 65 R v Karan [2013] NSWCCA 53 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Otto (2005) 157 A Crim R 525; [2005] NSWCCA 333 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; (2001) 127 A Crim R 369 R v Riddell (2009) 194 A Crim R 524; [2009] NSWCCA 96 Seah v R [2011] NSWCCA 269 Speer v R [2004] NSWCCA 118 Thong Nguyen v R [2012] NSWCCA 184 Webber v R [2014] NSWCCA 111 Wong v R [2018] NSWCCA 263 Youssef v R [2011] NSWCCA 104 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sargon Awraham (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: I McLachlan (Applicant) S Duggan (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate