NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bell v Hartnett Lawyers (No. 2) [2021] NSWSC 1270 Hearing dates: 23 March, 26 April, 27 May & 13 July 2021 Date of orders: 12 October 2021 Decision date: 12 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Applications List Before: Slattery J Decision: The plaintiff's solicitors' costs in the Possession proceedings will not be referred for costs assessment but will become the subject of a specified gross sum costs order. The plaintiff in the Equity proceedings is ordered to pay the costs of the Motion to set aside the originating process. Catchwords: COSTS – Costs assessment – Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4) – a mortgagee ("the mortgagee") brings proceedings in 2014 for possession ("the Possession proceedings") of real estate of a deceased mortgagor ("the mortgagor") – the mortgagee appoints solicitor to act for her in the Possession proceedings – son of deceased mortgagor ("the son") evicted from mortgaged property – mortgagee also dies – no legal representative of her estate is appointed – mortgage debt is $33,000 – the mortgagee's solicitors' fees consume the bulk of the proceeds of sale of the mortgaged property, which are in excess of $352,137.02 - a balance of $33,792.46 remains for the mortgagor – son questions reasonableness of solicitors' fees in acting for the mortgagee and seeks referral to costs assessment – solicitor resists referral to costs assessment to a referee, or the making of a specified gross sum costs order – whether solicitors' fees should be referred for costs assessment – whether any referral for costs assessment should be under Queensland law in Queensland or in New South Wales under New South Wales law – whether Civil Procedure Act, s 98 orders are possible after one failed costs assessment and before another. MORTGAGES AND SECURITIES – Priorities – estate of deceased mortgagor entitled to equity of redemption in net proceeds of sale of mortgaged property – solicitor for mortgagee entitled to equitable litigation lien over proceeds of sale of mortgaged property – which equity is prior in time – issue not clearly raised on the pleadings – directions made for issue to be pleaded. CIVIL PROCEDURE – Service of originating process in equity proceedings ("the Equity proceedings") – where service of process is said to be defective pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 – where service failed to include a notice under the Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth) – the Court grants leave to serve originating process – what costs orders should be made. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 26, 56, 60, 98(4)(c) Legal Profession Act 2004, ss 305(b), 355(5) Legal Profession Act 2007 (QLD), s 335 Legal Profession Uniform Law: Uniform Law 2014 (NSW), s 264(1) Real Property Act 1900, s 57(2)(b) Service and Execution Act 1992 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Part 20, Division 3, rr 6.29, 6.32(d), 7.10, 7.10(2)(a)-(b), 10.34 Cases Cited: Adams v Bank of New South Wales [1984] 1 NSWLR 285 Aged Care Services Pty Ltd v Kanning Services Pty Ltd (2013) 86 NSWLR 174 Atanaskovic Hartnell v Birketu Pty Ltd – Supervisory Jurisdiction [2020] NSWSC 573 Atanaskovic Hartnell v Birketu Pty Ltd (2021) 392 ALR 154 Australasian Performing Rights Assoc Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Bank of Western Australia Ltd v Marsh [2000] WASC 2008 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No. 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Boyce v McIntyre (2009) 78 NSWLR 152 Council of the NSW Bar Association v Siggens [2021] NSWCA 40 Deakin-Bell v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2016] NSWSC 540 Edgar & Walker v Mead (1916) 23 CLR 29 Gel Custodians Pty Ltd v Estate of the Late Geoffrey Francis Bell [2013] NSWSC 973 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Newell; Murinti v De Costi (2018) 97 NSWLR 390 Nicholls v Michael Wilson Partners Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 141 Nudd v Mannix [2009] NSWCA 327 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No.3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Preston v Nikoladis [2017] NSWSC 1527 Re Sherborne Estate (No 2); Vanvalen v Neaves (2005) 65 NSWLR 268 Road Chalets Pty Ltd v Thornton Motors Pty Ltd (1986) 47 SASR 532 Robert Anthony Bell v Beau Timothy John Hartnett Lawyers [2021] NSWSC 202 Watson Wyatt Superannuation Pty Ltd v Oberlechner & 2 ors (2008) ASC 155-091 Willmott v Barber (1881) 17 Ch D 772 Texts Cited: G Dal Pont, Law of Costs (4th ed, 2018, LexisNexis Butterworths) JP Hamilton, "Containment of costs: litigation and arbitration" (presentation, 1 June 2007) RP Meagher, JD Heydon, MJ Leeming, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (5th ed, 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The 2014/354291 proceedings:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate