NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MDM v PR [2020] NSWCATCD 5 Hearing dates: 6 December 2019 Date of orders: 11 March 2020 Decision date: 11 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: K Rosser, Principal Member Decision: 1. The application is dismissed because it is withdrawn. 2. An order dispensing with a hearing of the application for suppression orders is made under s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. 3. The publication of the parties' names is restricted from publication except to the parties. 4. The publication of the documents which have been received in evidence by the Tribunal, evidence given before the Tribunal at the hearing on 6 December 2019, including all recordings, whether written, electronic or oral, of that hearing be restricted from publication except to the parties. 5. By consent of the parties, the content of the affidavit of 28 November 2019 filed in these proceedings is restricted for publication and is to be stored by the Tribunal in a sealed envelope marked "confidential". 6. By consent of the parties, these orders shall not prevent the identification of any party in the proceedings or the communication of any pleading, transcript or recording of evidence or other document in the proceedings to: i.the employer of one of the parties and correspondence that amounts to a complaint. ii. any body that is responsible for disciplining members of the legal profession in a State or Territory. 7. These reasons for decision are not to be published otherwise than to the parties without appropriate redactions. Catchwords: SUPRESSION ORDER – Anonymisation of parties' names – Restrictions on publication Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Russell v Russell (1976) 134 CLR 495 Reinhard v Welker [2011] NSWCA 403 CYL v YZA [2017] NSWCATAP Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: MDM (Applicant) PR (First Respondent) TT (Second Respondent) GW (Third Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self represented) Jane Crittenden Lawyer (Respondents) File Number(s): SC 19/49726 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate