NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Richard Gillam v Cumberland Council [2021] NSWDC 538 Hearing dates: 24 and 25 February 2021 1, 2 and 3 March 2021 14 May 2021 Date of orders: 23 August 2021 Decision date: 23 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: Verdict for the Defendant Catchwords: PERSONAL INJURY –– Plaintiff sustained injury to his left wrist performing work for the Defendant as a general labourer using a high pressure hose – Where evidence of different versions recorded about how accident occurred – General caution to be exercised in considering such versions – Where Plaintiff had not established accident occurred in the manner contended – Court not satisfied that the relevant risk of harm materialised – Where the Plaintiff did not advance an alternate case EVIDENCE –– Witness evidence – Where Plaintiff fails to question a witness it called in respect of circumstances surrounding injury – Where no inferences favourable drawn due to the Plaintiff's failure to ask questions of a witness in chief or re-examination – Consideration of principles in Jones v Dunkel and Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd DAMAGES –– Non-economic loss – Past and Future out of Pocket Expenses – Future loss of earning capacity – Past and Future Domestic Assistance Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5H, 13 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 36, 38 Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z Cases Cited: Alan Donald v Rail Corporation of New South Wales [2016] NSWSC 1897 Atkinson v Gameco (NSW) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 338 Bassett v Cameron [2021] NSWSC 207 Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard [2009] NSWCA 167 Bourke v Victorian Work Cover Authority [1999] 1 VR 189 Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Davies v Whitehaven Coal Mining Limited (2020) 300 IR 76; [2020] NSWCA 219 Davis v Council of the City of Wagga Wagga [2004] NSWCA 34 Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298. Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; (2011) 276 ALR 375 Mason v Demasi [2009] NSWCA 227 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 Pollard v Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd (2008) 172 IR 453; [2008] NSWCA 99 Raimondo v State of South Australia (1979) 23 ALR 513 Sangha v Baxter (2009) 52 MVR 492; [2009] NSWCA 78 SAS Realty Developments Pty Ltd v Kerr [2013] NSWCA 56 Shaw v Thomas [2010] NSWCA 169 Teuma v CP & PK Judd Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 166 TNT Australia Pty Ltd v Christie (2003) 65 NSWLR 1; [2003] NSWCA 27 White v Benjamin [2015] NSWCA 75 Williams v Metcash Trading Ltd (2019) 286 IR 438; [2019] NSWCA 94 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Gillam (Plaintiff) Cumberland Council (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J. Malouf (Plaintiff) R. Gambi (Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate