NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Boland v SAS Trustee Corporation [2021] NSWDC 545 Hearing dates: 20 September 2022 and 6 October 2021 Plaintiff's supplementary written submissions 7 October 2021 and Defendant's supplementary written submissions 7 October 2021 Date of orders: 12 October 2021 Decision date: 12 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: (1) The Defendant's Notice of Motion is dismissed (2) I will hear from the parties as to costs Catchwords: INTERLOCUTORY MOTION –– Motion for dismissal of proceedings for abuse of process pursuant to UCPR 36.14 – Consideration of principles applicable – Dismissal not appropriate where matters of fact and law are debateable JURISDICTION –– Application of section 10B(1) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW) to a former police officer – Status of previous decision of the Industrial Court in Court Session in Berrick Boland v SAS Trustee Corporation in light of SAS Trustee Corporation v Rossetti holding that the Industrial Relations Commission in Court Session lacked jurisdiction – Whether the previous decision of the Industrial Relations Court in Court Session in respect of s 10B(2) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW) precluded the District Court from hearing a further application under s 21 of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW) by reason of issue estoppel and res judicata STATUTORY INTERPRETATION –– Application of s 48 of the Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) to s 10 B (2) Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW), ss 10B, 21 Superannuation Administration Act 1996 (NSW), s 88 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 3, 5, 48 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.4 Cases Cited: Berrick Boland v SAS Trustee Corporation [1999] NSWIRComm 488 Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571 Collier v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1359 DMW v CGW (1982) 151 CLR 491 Jennings v Commissioner of Police (1996) 13 NSWCCR 640 Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 Macks, Re; Ex parte Saint (2000) 204 CLR 158 Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Kurtovic (1990) 21 FCR 193 Residual Assco Group v Spalvins (2000) 202 CLR 629 Richardson v SAS Trustee Corporation (1999) 18 NSWCCR 423 SAS Trustee Corporation v Rossetti [2018] NSWCA 68 Schinnerl v The Commissioner of Police [1992] NSWCA 224 Simmons v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 405 Sleiman v Gadalla Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 236 State of New South Wales v Williams (2014) 242 A Crim R 22 Tomlinson v Ramsay Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Berrick Boland (Plaintiff) SAS Trustee Corporation (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Hammond (Plaintiff) Mr T Ower (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate