NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Elali v Department of Customer Service [2021] NSWCATAD 302 Hearing dates: 4 August 2021, 1 September 2021 Date of orders: 20 October 2021 Decision date: 20 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: Leave is refused for the Applicant's complaint against the Respondent to proceed Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — discrimination — equal opportunity — leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act Crimes Legislation Amendment (Telecommunications Offences and Other Measures) Act 2004 (Cth) Cases Cited: Alchin v Rail Corporation NSW [2012] NSWADT 142 Bassili v The Star Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 167 Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge (EOD) [2000] NSWADTAP 5 Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Hubbard v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW [2010] NSWADT 99 IW v The City of Perth [1997] HCA 30; (1997) 191 CLR 1 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104 Munt v Workers Compensation Independent Review Officer [2020] NSWCATAD 156 Nicholls v Director General, Department of Education and Training (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 20 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 73 Purvis v State of New South Wales [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29; (2000) 49 NSWLR 262 Spence v Roberts (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 361 State Electricity Commission of Victoria v Rabel [1998] 1 VR 102 Wade v Lord Howe Island Board Administration Office [2020] NSWCATAD 190 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Saamer Elali (Applicant) Department of Customer Service (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Kingston Reid (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00189935 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate