NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: NOVA Employment Ltd v Michelle Hira & Ors [2021] NSWSC 1337 Hearing dates: 12 October 2021 Date of orders: 15 October 2021 Decision date: 15 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Rein J Decision: Decline to grant the interim injunction sought Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW — Contract — Restraint of trade — Injunction sought restraining former employees from engaging in employment with competitors of the former employer — Undertakings proffered by all three Defendants, yet only those undertakings proffered by the First Defendant accepted by the Plaintiff — Former and new employers engage in the provision of assistance to persons with disabilities who are seeking employment — Weak prima facie case for the injunctions sought — Balance of convenience favours the Defendants — Held: interim injunction not granted Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Amway Corporation v Eurway International Ltd [1974] RPC 82 AT Kearney Australia Pty Ltd v Crepaldi [2006] NSWSC 23 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Cactus Imaging Pty Ltd v Peters (2006) 71 NSWLR 9; [2006] NSWSC 717 Empirnall Holdings Pty Ltd v Machon Paull Partners Pty Ltd (1998) 14 NSWLR 523 HiTech Group Australia Ltd v Riachi [2021] NSWSC 1212 Jardin Investments Pty Ltd v Metcash Ltd [2011] NSWCA 409 JMB (NSW) Pty Limited trading as McGrath Central Coast v West [2020] NSWSC 1380 Koops Martin v Dean Reeves [2006] NSWSC 449 O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310 Portal Software v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC 1179 Quantum Service and Logistics Pty Ltd v Schenker Australia Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 2 Raine & Horne Pty Limited v Adacol Pty Limited & Ors [2006] NSWSC 36 Stacks Taree v Marshall (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 77 Texts Cited: G E Dal Pont, Law of Confidentiality (2nd ed, 2020, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: NOVA Employment Limited (Plaintiff) Michelle Hira (First Defendant) Antonia Randell (Second Defendant) Jordan Kurtbatoff-Hira (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Alkadamani (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate