NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Blissett v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2021] NSWCA 253 Hearing dates: 24 September 2021 Date of orders: 22 October 2021 Decision date: 22 October 2021 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Gleeson JA at [92]; Simpson AJA at [93] Decision: 1. Application for an extension of time to file the summons and amended summons refused. 2. Amended summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – application for review of District Court decision dismissing appeal from conviction in Local Court – application for extension of time – where review limited to jurisdictional error on part of District Court – whether personal service of court attendance notice in accordance with Local Court Rules a condition for exercise of Local Court's summary criminal jurisdiction – whether applicant denied procedural fairness – whether primary judge erred in rejecting applicant's "claim of right" defence – no arguable jurisdictional error of District Court Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 125 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 11, 17, 18, 20 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5B Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 177, 190, 192, 196, 260(1) District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 59, 65, 66, 69 Local Court Rules 2009 (NSW), r 5.9(1)(a) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 59.10 Cases Cited: Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52 Garde v Dowd (2011) 80 NSWLR 620; [2011] NSWCA 115 Gibson v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 218 Jamal v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 121 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Liristis v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCA 66 Lunney v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 186 Morgan v District Court of New South Wales (2017) 94 NSWLR 463; [2017] NSWCA 105 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 264 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 4 R v Fuge [2001] NSWCCA 208; (2001) 123 A Crim R 310 Spanos v Lazaris [2008] NSWCA 74 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: D T Blissett (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Local Court of New South Wales (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: CO Gleeson (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate