NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hickey v Secretary, Department of Education [2021] NSWCATAD 306 Hearing dates: 30 - 31 August 2021 Date of orders: 22 October 2021 Decision date: 22 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Riordan, Senior Member Decision: I make the following orders: (1) The decisions under review are set aside. (2) The application is remitted to the Respondent under s 65 of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) for reconsideration. (3) Within 8 weeks of the date of these orders, the Respondent is to inform the Applicant of the outcome of the reconsideration. (4) Within 4 weeks after that date the Applicant is to advise the Respondent and the Tribunal whether she wishes to: a. Continue with the review of the varied or new decision; or b. Withdraw the application for review. (5) The matter is listed for directions or dismissal on 21 January 2022 at 9:30am. (6) I grant all parties leave to appear on 21 January 2022 by way of either AVL or telephone. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative review – Government information – refusal to deal with application – whether substantial and unreasonable diversion of agency's resources – consideration of ss 60(3A) and (3B) factors Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth). Cases Cited: Amos v Western NSW Local Health District; Arnold v Western NSW Local Health District [2017] NSWCATAD 359 Cianfrano v Director General, Premier's Department [2006] NSWADT 137 Colefax v Department of Education and Communities (No. 2) [2013] NSWADT 130 Commercial Union Assurance Co (Australia) Limited v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Commissioner of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Barrett [2015] NSWCATAP 68 Dezfouli v Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network [2021] NSWCATAD 189 Hanna v NSW Ministry of Health [2019] NSWCATAD 21 Learmouth v Secretary, Department of Education [2020] NSWCATAD 109 Loussikian v University of Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 140 Ruyters v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 223 Samandi v NSW Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWCATAD 286 Singh v Legal Aid Commission (No 2) [2015] NSWCATAD 5 Zonnevylle v Department of Education and Communities [2016] NSWCATAD 49 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vanessa Hickey (Applicant) Secretary, Department of Education (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Zheng (Applicant) D Lloyd (Respondent) Solicitors: Gilbert & Tobin (Applicant) Moray & Agnew (Respondent) C Higgins (Information Commissioner) File Number(s): 2021/00059128 Publication restriction: Not applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate