NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Fung [2021] NSWSC 1359 Hearing dates: 22 October 2021 Date of orders: 22 October 2021 Decision date: 22 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: See [41] Catchwords: CRIME – Money Laundering – Dealing with money suspected of being proceeds of crime – Serious and indictable offences PROPERTY – Property suspected of being proceeds of indictable offences – s 19(1)(d) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) – Restraining Orders – Custody and Control Orders CIVIL PROCEDURE – Service – Substituted service – Rule 1014 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 – Where the only possible method of service is by electronic mail – Orders for substituted service made Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth) 400.3(1), 400.9(1) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) ss 18,19, 338 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 1014 Cases Cited: George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104; [1990] HCA 26 Williams v Keelty (2001) 111 FCR 175; [2001] FCA 1301 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Yuen Hong Fung (First Defendant) Kha Weng Foong (Second Defendant) Un Sai Cheng (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Tully (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: Penelope Kelton(Plaintiff) Lloyd Truman Sadiq Solicitors (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2021/261735 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate