NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Geracitano v Cloughessy [2021] NSWCATAP 329 Hearing dates: 21 October 2021 Date of orders: 26 October 2021 Decision date: 26 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: The Hon F Marks Principal Member G Blake AM SC Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused (2) The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL – failure by appellants to provide material in accordance with Directions for the preparation of the appeal – failure held to have denied the Appeal Panel the opportunity of considering the appeal – leave to appeal refused and appeal dismissed DIVIDING FENCES – held that Order that fence constructed on top of a retaining wall within jurisdiction despite proposed collateral use of the retaining wall to retain a driveway Legislation Cited: Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW), s 3 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act (NSW), s 80, Sch 4, cl 12 Cases Cited: None cited Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Geracitano (Appellant) Tharon Cloughessy (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self Represented) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2021/00215180 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 29 June 2021 Before: D Charles Senior Member File Number(s): COM 20/38815
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate