NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Impressive Builders Pty Ltd v Cleary [2021] NSWCATAP 331 Hearing dates: 18 October 2021 Date of orders: 18 October 2021 Decision date: 26 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Goodman SC, Senior Member C Mulvey, Senior Member Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. The appeal is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: APPEALS – whether error of law – whether leave to appeal should be granted Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), ss 7AAA, 10, 48MA and 48O s 80 and Sch 4, cl 12 Cases Cited: Al-Daouk v Mr Pine Pty Ltd t/as Furnco Bankstown [2015] NSWCATAP 111 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 SZTOG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 112 ZNX v ZNY [2020] NSWCATAP 41 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Impressive Builders Pty Ltd (Appellant) Glenn Cleary (First Respondent) Amanda Cleary (Second Respondent) Representation: Mr D Condon (Director of Appellant) Respondents (Self-represented) File Number(s): 2021/00217514 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 29 June 2021 Before: P Boyce, General Member File Number(s): HB 21/14182; HB 21/02293
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate