NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hana v Shad Legal Services Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 258 Hearing dates: 15 September 2021 Date of orders: 27 October 2021 Decision date: 27 October 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Payne JA at [6]; Brereton JA at [70] Decision: (1) Summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed. (2) Applicant to pay the costs of the respondent. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — pleadings — striking out — abuse of process — where statement of claim pleads fact inconsistent with finding of Court of Appeal in earlier proceedings — statement of claim constitutes collateral attack on Court of Appeal's decision — statement of claim struck out as abuse of process Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Abriel v Levitt [2004] NSWCA 258 Cleary v Jeans (2006) 65 NSWLR 355; [2006] NSWCA 9 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victorian Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 12 Driclad Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1968) 121 CLR 45 at 64; [1968] HCA 91 Ekes v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 336 Foukkare v Angreb Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 335 Habib v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 231 Harris v Rapisarda [2019] NSWSC 1088 Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana; In the Estate of Nadia Mekhail (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 1452 Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana [2019] NSWCA 197 O'Shane v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd (2013) 85 NSWLR 698; [2013] NSWCA 315 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 Rogers v Roche (No 1) [2017] 2 Qd R 306; [2016] QCA 340 State Bank of New South Wales v Stenhouse (1997) Aust Tort Reports ¶81-423 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757; [2012] NSWCA 285 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507; [2015] HCA 28 TriCare (Hastings) Ltd v Allen [2015] NSWCA 344 Walpole v Partridge and Wilson [1994] QB 106 Texts Cited: A Zuckerman, Civil Procedure (2003, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Georgette Hana (Applicant) Shad Legal Services Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: JE Sexton SC, JC Lee, BJS Smith (Applicant) G Ng (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate