NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ZQ2 Management Pty Ltd v The Council of the City of Sydney [2021] NSWLEC 1656 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 25 August, 10 & 20 September, and 15 October 2021 Date of orders: 2 November 2021 Decision date: 02 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) Pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent consent authority that are thrown away as a result of amending the development application, as agreed at $4,000.00. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application D/2021/292 for alterations and additions to two existing buildings to construct a three (3) storey mixed use development comprising ground floor commercial tenancies and a boarding house use on the two levels above on land legally comprising of two allotments described as Lot 1 DP 962466, known as 193 King Street, Newtown and Lot 1 DP 448549, known as 195 King Street, Newtown is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure "A". Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – Boarding house development in heritage conservation area – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.7, 8.15 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009, cl 29, 30, 30A, 49 State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 - Remediation of Land, cl 7 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007, cl 101 Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 4.3, 4.4, 5.10, 6.21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ZQ2 Management Pty Ltd (First Applicant) ZQ3 Management Pty Ltd (Second Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G McKee (Solicitor) (Applicants) A Simpson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate