Soulis v R & A Henry Auto Repairs Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 338

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Soulis v R & A Henry Auto Repairs Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 338 Hearing dates: 3 May 2021 Date of orders: 29 October 2021 Decision date: 29 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member A Lo Surdo SC, Senior Member Decision: The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: APPEALS – Claim under the Australian Consumer Law (NSW) – need to provide evidence of causal link between conduct and loss. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act (NSW) 2013 Fair Trading Act (NSW) 1987 Motor Dealers and Repairers Act (NSW) 2013 Cases Cited: C2C Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 644 Jardin v Metcash Ltd [2011] NSWCA 409 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR Kameel Pty Ltd v Casey CC [2006] VCAT 526 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd v Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 223 SH v Chief Executive Officer of Department of Communities [2019] WASCA 31 TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1988] FCA 119; (1988) 82 ALR 175 Trade Practices Commission v Manfal Pty Ltd [1991] FCA 650; (1991) 33 FCR 382 Yuen v Thom [2016] NSWCATAP 243 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Soulis (Appellant) R & A Henry Auto Repairs Pty Ltd (Respondent) Brett Allen Henry (Respondent) Mark Gary Henry (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (self-represented) Respondents (self-represented) File Number(s): 2021/56089 (AP 21/05927) Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 15 January 2021 Before: S Hennings, Member File Number(s): MV 20/38034