NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bazouni v R [2021] NSWCCA 256 Hearing dates: 16 June 2021 Decision date: 05 November 2021 Before: Bell P at [1]; Rothman J at [4]; Button J at [40] Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – fraud by loans manager of bank – directions to jury as to elements of offence – Crown conceded that trial judge had misdirected the jury with regard to mental element of dishonesty – knowledge, as opposed to recklessness, necessary on the part of an accused person as to conduct being dishonest according to the standards of ordinary people – miscarriage of justice established – whether "the proviso" can be applied – whether "no substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred" – by majority, appeal dismissed by way of application of the proviso Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 4B, 192B, 192E, 344A Crimes Amendment (Fraud, Identity and Forgery Offences) Act 2010 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW), r 4.15 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 134.1 and 134.2 Cases Cited: A.E. Terry's Motors Ltd v Rinder [1948] SASR 167 Bonnard v London General Omnibus (1921) 38 RPC 1 Burford v Clifford [1932] 2 Ch 122 Cesan v The Queen (2008) 236 CLR 358; [2008] HCA 52 Chatsworth Investments Ltd v Amoco (UK) Ltd [1968] 1 Ch 665 Commissioner for Superannuation v Scott, F.o. (1987) 13 FCR 404 Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53; [2003] HCA 75 Hofer v R [2019] NSWCCA 244 Kalbasi v Western Australia (2018) 264 CLR 62; [2018] HCA 7 Marc A Hammond Pty Ltd v Papa Carmine Pty Ltd (1977) 28 FLR 160 O'Brien Glass Industries Ltd v Cool & Sons Pty Ltd (1983) 77 FLR 441 Palser v Grinling [1948] 1 All ER 1 Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493; [1998] HCA 7 Priday v The Queen [2019] NSWCCA 272 R v Ghosh (1982) 2 All ER 689; [1982] EWCA Crim 2 (Ghosh) R v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 457 Re Bonny [1986] 2 Qd R 80 Re: Migliorini; ex parte Silk Brothers (1974) 22 FLR 49 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Bazouni (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M McHugh SC with M Fleeton (Appellant) B K Baker with W Liu (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate