NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Himo v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 321 Hearing dates: 14 October 2021 Date of orders: 2 November 2021 Decision date: 02 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: LICENSING – firearms – fit and proper person – public interest – history of domestic violence - association with known criminal – lack of candour – traffic record – false and misleading statements – disregard for regulatory scheme Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: Aubrey v Commissioner of Police [2005] NSWADT 266 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Barlow v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2003] NSWADT 254 Bladen v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 240 Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor (1995) 131 ALR 657 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Cook v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 204 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1991] VicRp 6; (1991) 1 VR 63. Hill v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 218 Hook v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 250 Hunt v Commissioner of Police [2021] NCATAD 58 In Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Keegan Jacques v Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWCATAD 145 Kogias v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 297 Leatham v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 121 Martin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 97 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1FCR 353 at 357 Masterson v Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWCATAP 206 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Potts v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2010] NSWADT 311 Prevetera v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 133 Stamatelatos v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 156 Tannous v Commissioner of Police [2011] NSWAT 116) Vella v The Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWADT 91 Ward v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jacob Himo (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Hartmann & Associates (Applicant) Maddocks Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/129792 Publication restriction: Pursuant to ss 64(1)(c) and (d) of the CAT Act, the transcript and recording of the confidential hearing, confidential exhibits, and the contents of all paragraphs in these reasons marked "[Not for publication]" are not to be published or released to the Applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate