NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kumar v RSK Constructions Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 342 Hearing dates: 27 September 2021 Date of orders: 02 November 2021 Decision date: 02 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: The Hon F Marks Principal Member P H Molony Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeals brought by the appellant are upheld. (2) The orders made by the Tribunal in HB 20/47784 and HB 20/36459 are set aside. (3) The proceedings in HB 20/47784 and HB 20/36459 are remitted to the Tribunal differently constituted for reconsideration in such manner and subject to such conditions as the Tribunal may determine is appropriate in all the circumstances. Catchwords: APPEALS – applications brought before Consumer and Commercial Division – failure by parties to raise issues identified in directions hearings – failure by Tribunal to consider fundamental issues including identification of contracting parties, the contract and compliance with statutory requirements – failure to accord procedural fairness – held proceedings miscarried – orders set aside and proceedings remitted for reconsideration before Tribunal differently constituted. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act s81 Home Building Act ss 7AAA, 10 Cases Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pardeep Kumar (Appellant) RSK Constructions Pty Ltd (1st Respondent) Mohamed Raees Kirsten (2nd Respondent) Representation: E Georges solicitor (Appellant) M Kirsten agent (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate