NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Khudadadi v R [2021] NSWCCA 259 Hearing dates: 22 September 2021 Date of orders: 3 November 2021 Decision date: 03 November 2021 Before: Price J at [1]; Hamill J at [47]; Ierace J at [48] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – applicant found guilty by a jury of causing grievous bodily harm with intent – whether sentencing judge failed to consider s 22A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – arguments not advanced in court below – whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33, 35 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 22A Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Griffin v R [2018] NSWCCA 259 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Jackson v R [2021] NSWCCA 15 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mulvihill v R [2016] NSWCCA 259 R v Spinks [2021] NSWSC 649 R v Tuuta [2014] NSWCCA 40 Sumpton v R [2016] NSWCCA 162 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Amir Khan Khudadadi (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Kluss (Applicant) Ms C Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate