NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Spencer v Coshott (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 266 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 25 November 2021 Decision date: 25 November 2021 Before: Bell P; Emmett AJA; Simpson AJA Decision: Pursuant to s 98(4) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 the respondent (Ronald Coshott) pay to the applicant (Keith Spencer): 1. in relation to the statutory appeal to the District Court, costs in the gross sum of $23,392.78; 2. in relation to the judicial review proceedings in this Court, costs in the gross sum of $22,395.07; 3. relation to the application for gross sum costs, costs in the sum of $3,002.48. Catchwords: COSTS – gross sum costs – where administration of justice served by bringing litigation to an end Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(4)(c) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), s 89 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: eInduct Systems Pty Ltd v 3D Safety Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 422 Spencer v Coshott [2021] NSWCA 235 Category: Costs Parties: Keith Spencer (Applicant) Ronald Coshott (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Castle/A Bailey (Applicant) J O'Sullivan (Respondent)
Solicitors: Nexus Lawyers (Applicant) D Iacono, & Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/142329 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Civil Date of Decision: 19 February 2021 Before: Curtis ADCJ File Number(s): 2020/293294
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate