NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Olivia Ross v Patrick Lane (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 121 Hearing dates: 13 October 2021; written submissions by 22 October Date of orders: 4 November 2021 Decision date: 04 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders a [157] Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - challenge to validity of development consent - challenge raises failure of consent authority to address the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy 65 (the SEPP) - did the SEPP give rise to a jurisdictional prerequisite required to be determined objectively - SEPP to be taken as requiring jurisdictional determination - objective factual consideration of the jurisdictional requirement – proposed development not "the substantial redevelopment or the substantial refurbishment of an existing building" - development application did not trigger requirement to comply with the SEPP - summons dismissed. COSTS - costs ordinarily follow the event - no basis to depart from presumption - consent authority enters submitting appearance save as to costs - Applicant ordered to pay the First Respondent's costs Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15 and 9.45 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 25B State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development, cll 2, 4 and Sch 1 Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Barton Securities Limited v Warringah Council & Others (2009) 170 LGERA 223; [2009] NSWLEC 179 Gett v Tabet [2009] NSWCA 76; (2009) 254 ALR 504 Hunter's Hill Council v Minister for Local Government; Lane Cove Council v Minister for Local Government; Mosman Municipal Council v Minister for Local Government; North Sydney Council v Minister for Local Government; Strathfield Municipal Council v Minister for Local Government [2017] NSWCA 188 Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Limited v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298 Olivia Ross v Patrick Lane [2021] NSWLEC 61 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Taylor v The Owners of Strata Plan 11564 and Others (2014) 253 CLR 531; [2014] HCA 9 Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd (2004) 61 NSWLR 707; [2004] NSWCA 422 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Olivia Ross (Applicant) Patrick Lane (First Respondent) Sydney City Council (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr G Farland and Ms L Sims, barristers (Applicant) Ms J Reid, barrister (First Respondent) Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate