NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Woodbridge v Degabrielle [2021] NSWCATAP 352 Hearing dates: 28 October 2021 Date of orders: 28 October 2021 Decision date: 09 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member G Burton SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING — Fences and boundaries — "Dividing fence" — no appellable error Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) ss 80, 81, Sch 4 cl 12 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) r 25 Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW) ss 3, 4, 7 Cases Cited: Bolton v Grose [2019] NSWCATAP 251 CEO of Customs v AMI Toyota Ltd (2000) 102 FCR 578; [2000] FCA 1343 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dean Woodbridge (First Appellant) Yasmin Woodbridge (Second Appellant) Marie Rosalie Degabrielle (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Joseph (Appellants) Solicitors: Appellants (self-represented) Respondent (self-represented) File Number(s): 2021/00227749 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 11 July 2021 Before: H Smith, General Member File Number(s): COM 20/43653
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate