NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ramzy Sebie v Andy Duong Duc Pham [2021] NSWSC 1433 Hearing dates: 4 November 2021 Date of orders: 5 November 2021 Decision date: 04 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Sackar J Decision: See [51]-[52] Catchwords: PROCEDURE – dismissal of proceedings for want of prosecution – where one plaintiff deceased and no information available as to his estate – where the second plaintiff is under legal incapacity – where no tutor has been appointed Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr.12.7, 12.10, 13.6, 36.16, 42.20 Cases Cited: Andy Vuong Duc Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Limited [2021] NSWSC 1132 Ghosh v Ninemsm Pty Ltd (2015) 90 NSWLR 595 Green v Healthscope Ltd t/as The Hills Private Hospital [2015] NSWCA 325 Kapoor v State Transit Authority of NSW [2010] NSWCA 143 Sebie v Pham [2018] NSWCA 333 Sebie v Pham [2021] NSWSC 470 Stollznow v Calvert [1980] 2 NSWLR 749 Witten v Lombard Australia Ltd [1968] 2 NSWR 529 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Ramzy Sebie (first plaintiff) Rose Sebie (second plaintiff) Andy Duong Duc Pham (first defendant) Thi Huong Giang Pham (second defendant) Robert Sebie (third defendant) ENA Development Pty Ltd ACN 105235363 (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Zipser (1st and 2nd def) No other appearances
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate