Palm Lake Resort P/L v King and Metcalfe (No 2) [2021] NSWCATAP 355

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Palm Lake Resort P/L v King and Metcalfe (No 2) [2021] NSWCATAP 355 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 November 2021 Decision date: 09 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member G K Burton SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing of the application for costs is dispensed with. (2) Order that the appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeals on the ordinary basis as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEALS – Residential and holiday parks – permitted increase in site fees - costs Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), rr 38, 38A Cases Cited: Abdel-Messih v Wang [No 2] [2018] NSWCATAP 209 Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 25 Bonita v Shen [2016] NSWCATAP 159 Johnson t/as One Tree Constructions v Lukeman [2017] NSWCATAP 45 Knox v Bollen [2018] NSWCATAP 106 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes PL [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Oppidan Homes PL v Yang [2017] NSWCATAP 67 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Owners SP 63341 v Malachite Holdings PL [2018] NSWCATAP 256 Palm Lake Resort P/L v King and Metcalfe [2021] NSWCATAP 195 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Tork v Parklea Operations PL [2020] NSWCATAP 21 Texts Cited: nil Category: Costs Parties: Palm Lake Resort PL (Appellant) Richard Lounder, Thomas Metcalfe, Ian King, and others listed in Annexure A to each notice of appeal (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: C D Wood SC (Appellant) P Batley, counsel, with A Sotera, advocate (Respondents)