NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wainidiva Pty Ltd v Waverley Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1692 Hearing dates: 17 and 18 May 2021 Date of orders: 29 November 2021 Decision date: 29 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: Orders: see [6]. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – boarding house – whether Applicant's written request to vary height of buildings development standard is well founded – whether existing dwellings are contributory items – whether existing dwellings can be demolished – whether proposed development is compatible with the character of the local area – whether proposed development is compatible with character of heritage conservation area – whether design of boarding house is acceptable Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: Waindiva Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2021] NSWLEC 1615 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wainidiva Pty Ltd (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Wright (Applicant) M Staunton (Respondent)
Solicitors: Boskovitz Lawyers (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/43146 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In a judgment given on 15 October 2021, Waindiva Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2021] NSWLEC 1615, I handed down my decision on the appeal by Waindiva Pty Ltd against the refusal by the Waverly Council of its development application no. DA-426/2019. 2. That application sought consent for the demolition of three dwellings and the construction of a boarding house containing 37 rooms with a basement containing 10 at grade parking spaces, 8 parking platforms in a stacker and a space for a small garbage collection vehicle to facilitate its loading and unloading. 3. At [95] in my judgment of 15 October 2021: 1. the Applicant was directed to amend its plans reflecting the conclusions of the judgment at [92], by no later than Friday 22 October 2021; 2. relying on the provisions of s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the Court exercised the function of Waverley Council as the relevant consent authority under cl 55(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, to agree to the Applicant further amending its development application DA-426/2019, as tendered into evidence at the hearing, to reflect direction made above (at direction (1)); 3. the Parties were directed as follows: 1. the Respondent, Waverley Council, as the relevant consent authority, was to lodge the amendment of the development application on the NSW planning portal within 10 days of the date of the direction in the judgment and was to notify the Applicant after it had been lodged; 2. the Applicant was to file with the Court a copy of the amended development application within 2 days after the Respondent had notified the Applicant that the amendment had been lodged on the NSW planning portal; 3. the Parties were to agree and file with the Court final conditions of consent, by no later than 3pm on Friday 29 October 2021, reflecting the conclusions in the Court's judgment. 1. The Parties have now complied with those directions and have agreed and filed settled conditions of consent reflecting the conclusions in the Court's judgment. 2. As the Parties' agreed conditions of consent have now been filed, the Court is able to make final orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate