NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shik v Wu [2021] NSWCATCD 96 Hearing dates: 12 July 2021 Date of orders: 15 September 2021 Decision date: 16 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P French, Senior Member Decision: (1) Shen Hua Wu must pay Lydiawati Shik $3,265.43 immediately. (2) Rental Bond Services must pay the tenant, Lydiawati Shik, the whole of Rental Bond No. S954405-7. (3) The application is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES: Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) – frustration – where premises become wholly uninhabitable – termination notice – defects in a termination notice – whether landlord entitled to a break fee - landlord's liability for damage and loss suffered by a tenant where there is no breach of a landlord obligation Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abdel Messih v Marshall [2018] NSWCS 648 De Soleil v Palmhide P/L [2010] CTTT 464 Kenny v Killalea [2015] NSWCATAP 66 Menashi v Ly [1997] NSWRT 162 Texts Cited: Coronavirus (COVID 19) Temporary Changes to NCAT Operations procedure (18 March 2020 and as subsequently updated) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lydiawati Shik (Applicant) Hen Hua Wu (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self Represented) Melody Wu, Property Manager (Respondent) File Number(s): RT 21/21262 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate