NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: FBJ v Saul [2021] NSWCATAD 339 Hearing dates: 6 October 2021 Date of orders: 15 November 2021 Decision date: 15 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: Leave for the complaints of victimisation to proceed is refused under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — discrimination — equal opportunity — leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave – victimisation Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Carroll v Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCATAD 82 Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: FBJ (Applicant) Rosemary Ellen Curran Saul (First Respondent) Justin Aitken (Second Respondent) Representation: Dr K Johnson as GAL for the Applicant
Solicitors: Hospitality Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/205892 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the name of the Applicant is not to be published.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate